[Server Feedback]

Topic title; "Feedack"

 

I guess the server feedback form could do with reviewal seeing as it asks people what their age is, their in-game name twice, what software they use to edit maps and so on.

[Vehicle Locks]

touché

[Vehicle Locks]

When one holds a key for a house, you can enter without needing to "unlock" the property via a command.

Surely the same can be done for cars? Do we really need to unlock a car each time when we hold a key for it?

[[DENIED] House license]

 

3 minutes ago, Mr.Pacho said:

Hahaha. Its funny you gone through DB to post this reply. 

Anyway, those 49 vehicles have 4 caddies. Do people want to own them? Buy from me. Those 49 vehicles consist of Infernus which I bought for 900k Buyout, if anyone can afford it please call at 6469. If no one can afford it its not my problem they sucks.

 

All those bitching on my Vehicles and Houses, listen up I bought those vehicles when you used to travel on state owned vehicles.  When no one actually cared about vehicles but rather running for good businesses. Jose_Espiga himself confirm that we bought couple of infernus to get High Buyout infuture wasnt that the point of Limited vehicles Locmax? Instead of those 49 vehicles I could have bought many more gokd business.

And yeah people bitching about the "Exclusive Properties and Vehicles I own" its not my problem you suck lol. 

This suits here most "They hate us because they aint us". 

 

Mature mate, keep it up. Noddy badge, mommy is proud.

[[DENIED] House license]

I shall be selling popcorn at the nearest street corner next to his 49 cars of which 2 are used.

 

On topic; you do realize people could buy a car from a dealer if they wanted to before people went and purchased all of the "limited" stock of said vehicles? That system worked.

There's no need for a person to own more than 3 houses just as there's no need for a person to own more than 6 cars instead of hiding them in multiple "groups".

[[DENIED] House license]

2 hours ago, LocMax said:

You own 49 vehicles and 13 properties as of this moment, and you still looking to harbor some more? 

I wonder how many of those 49 vehicles are limited sports vehicles that other players would like to own but cannot because you are just harboring 10s of them for decoration... or the same for properties.

 

Holy mother of god, someone needs a life...

No wonder so many legitimate players can't get vehicles because someone has taken all of them hostage for personal gain.

 

In regards to the licenses for house, unnecessary.

A player does not need more than three houses, I guarantee most of the players with three houses don't even use them all for "roleplay" purposes but just as a "status" symbol on a game to show they have virtual money which equates to nothing at the end of the day.

[Community input needed]

9 hours ago, Mr.Pacho said:

Before the removal of warehouses or w/e please keep in mind some people have bought them for 'High Buyouts' and players shouldnt suffer the loss because the Warehouses were not managed properly.

Everyone with proofs of buying Warehouses for High Buyouts should be returned the buyout they paid. Else you'll be just annoying and upsetting your players.  

 

Doubt that would ever happen as they would need to go around in circles to remove the money said players received for the warehouses they sold too which would just cascade into a giant shit show.

[Community input needed]

4 hours ago, Vladislav said:

Remove all warehouses, restrict them to official groups only. Refund owners with the full price they paid and that's it, one less problem to stress over.

 

Disregard the time and effort the owners have put in to getting such properties, the work they have already put in whilst owning them and just say "fu".

Brilliant plan if you wish to upset players and leave a bad taste in their mouth.

 

I take it you do not own a warehouse or if you do, you don't even use it hence your opinion is extremely one sided.

[Community input needed]

There is no way to "undo" what has been done due to poor planning and little to no structure behind the warehouse idea.

 

You can not simply go and remove the warehouses from those that aren't in "official" groups nor is it a good idea to say that you are going to limit it to official groups only. What does that mean for up and coming groups? They also have potential and should be given the opportunity to own a warehouse for competition sake.

 

A large official group can be undermined by the smaller group that owns a warehouse by careful planning and work. That's what it's all about isn't it? A competitive market? If it is limited to only official groups, that leaves all of these smaller groups in the dark with no purpose.

 

Sure it can be seen as "motivation" to get to an official status to be able to own a warehouse, but by the time they do that the current official groups have already taken over most of the state with the money earned off said warehouses. At the end of the day there's a limited number of warehouses and to restrict them even further to only official groups doesn't seem too worthwhile.

 

Sadly the property prices for the warehouses was seriously overlooked and should have been far greater given the amount of money one of those can produce but it's too late to make a change to the value without upsetting all of those invested in their warehouses already so you will have to let that slide.

 

If a solo person wishes to own a warehouse and they are going to run the operation solo, well so be it and why would you stop them?

If they are given a way to "employ" people that can be granted access to work with the warehouse, then that system would be perfect.