first, to distinguish attack to robbery, I did not want to rob and you wrote that I wanted to rob him and i do it. He was just going to give up when I wrote handsup, that was rp action.
congratulations, you delivered this after I wrote about it and i provided my journal.
It changed a lot in this way and that situation was completely different. The person in our car killed other person when he gave up. I killed the person I attacked because she started to run away when I wrote 'handsup' are two completely different situations. I was the only one who shot that person, so why did others get banned? it makes no sense man.
As for the accident, I was not driving the vehicle, so I am not responsible for it, but no one has deliberately crashed into a vehicle, it was an accidental accident, maybe the driver was delayed, maybe he was driving the vehicle incorrectly, I don't know.
Regarding the fbi vehicle, it only showed up when I shot that player, I didn't notice the police before, only after I started shooting that person there because she started running off on a 'handsup' command if the victim doesn't stop or run away, I can shoot her. and he didn't take 'a few steps back' but started to run towards his car ...
[#03] When performing a roleplay which has no initial intention of murder (like a robbery, arrest, etc) and the other party/victim does not comply, all (non-lethal force) roleplay options have to be exhausted before resulting to lethal force (murder, etc). For example: this means for a non complying robbery victim roleplay attempts should be done to reach the initial roleplay goal.
man how could i cause a vehicle accident when i wasn't a driver? You mistake the person. The 'robbery' was not intended to steal but only to give up the victim, he did not follow the rules and started to run away, so the role-playing was exhausted and I started shooting.
well, I was not aware that FBI is nearby because I noticed them after or during the shooting of the victim, then only a shooting happened between the police and us, so my colleagues got a ban, why if they did not participate in the attack on the victim and did not shoot at her ?
I didn't know there was a matchmaker in the area because I was near the spawn
firstly it wasn't initiated for no reason and secondly we don't have a million networth in our account, I wrote to give up, that was to prevent him from drawing his gun. because he was demanding cash from us. So there was a reason, and it wasn't launching an attack for fun or dm or whatever, it just reason came out of rp. It was his fault that he died because he started running away instead of raising his hands up
wtf where do you draw such conclusions? never aimed at dm, no dm mentality. I was unaware of the safe zone that was at the scene of the action, I didn't know S.W.A.T was there so I wasn't fully aware. what blatant deathmatching? I killed one person and then the police started shooting at us, it wasn't killing some many people wtf.
man, you don't even know the details of this ban, we wanted to get rich quick on people but we didn't know that after one attack it has to be some time, they can't be attacks in a row, and that's why it was considered a 'dm mentality' because we didn't take a break after robberies because we were not aware of it. All the heists we did back then were roleplay compliant and away from safe zones.